Donator Rank Suggestion

Okay, so I was thinking about this. Almost Every server has 2-3 Tiers of Donator. Always regarded by the dollar sign symbol in different colours to match the status of the donator. Thats fine and makes sense.

But literally every server is either:
[$] Donator
[$] Super Donator
[$] Extreme Donator

OR

[$] Donator
[$] Extreme Donator

I've never coded anything different.

What if we used gems for a difference? or something. Maybe Gold, silver, bronze (<--this is somwhat common)

What i was thinking was just using something like
Saphhire Donator
Emerald Donator
Ruby Donator
Diamond Donator

I think its a good idea but for me to have 3+ Donators would be really hard to each give higher perks ingame, so anything 3+ would be a cosmetic rank only . By this I mean:

If There are those four gem ranks. Sapphire and Emerald would have the same Rights. Ruby and Diamond would have the same rights. It just adds as a checkpoint inbetween donations.

Right now the price for donator and extreme donator will have alot of contrast inbetween them. Another two could still have that contrast but appear as milestones inbetween Donator and Extreme Donator (Sapphire Donator and Diamond Donator)

It's something different, and if we do choose gems i can work with that ingame better than something that isnt a scaled ingame item.

What do you think?

I was thinking more along the line of Premium, VP or VIP.
Also another thing that crossed my mind was Members...
if we happen to have 2 worlds, we can make one members only with more stuff.
Of course members would be a monthly sub, at a cost, with a limited time.
But the benefits all depend on how you spend the time.

Rachel wrote:I was thinking more along the line of Premium, VP or VIP.
Also another thing that crossed my mind was Members...
if we happen to have 2 worlds, we can make one members only with more stuff.
Of course members would be a monthly sub, at a cost, with a limited time.
But the benefits all depend on how you spend the time.

I don't support members world, as it would split the small player base we have across two worlds.
What about member's only areas?
Members only resource dungeons, members only dungeons, members only training location, etc.

In my opinion, that would be a better idea, (but that's just my opinion, which you probably didn't ask for .)

I'm saying of course when the player base becomes larger
We could have two worlds, some areas are members only and they can be accessed in both worlds but only by members.
The second world being a members only world to provide a more private experience for people who don't want all the commotion.

At the moment we are too small for a playerbase. Me and JT have read and come up with ideas based off our own and yours and made a final decision. Soon enough a thread will be made about it.